Breast
Cancer in the U.S.
Introduction
The incidence of breast cancer in U.S.
women has been gradually rising over the past two decades
while, most recently, mortality rates have somewhat
declined. However, both incidence and mortality differ
substantially among women from different racial and
ethnic groups. Additionally, studies show that socioeconomic
factors contribute to disparities in breast cancer
care. The reduction of these disparities is a primary
and ongoing objective of leading public and private
health organizations. At the same time, current medical
research continues to build upon significant scientific
advances, toward the collective vision of reducing
the burden of breast cancer and improving outcomes
for all.
Breast
Cancer Facts
Breast cancer is the most common non-skin
cancer among U.S. women. During 2006, an estimated
274,900 new cases will have been diagnosed: 212,920
invasive breast cancers and 61,980 cases of in situ
carcinoma.
Of these, an approximate 85% will be ductal carcinoma
in situ.1 If
the current incidence rate stays the same, women born
today have about a 1 in 8 chance of developing breast
cancer at some point during their lives. Thirty years
ago, the lifetime risk was just under 1 in 10.2 Presently,
there are over 2 million women living in the U.S. who
have been diagnosed and treated for breast cancer3, 4
Gender is the most important risk factor
for breast cancer. While in any given year the disease
will be diagnosed in a small number of men (1,720 new
cases estimated for 2006), the number of women diagnosed
with breast cancer will be 100 times greater.5 Age
is the second most important risk factor; the majority
of advanced breast cancer cases are diagnosed in women
over 50.6 Other
factors are also known to increase a woman's risk for
the disease.7 However,
most breast cancers occur in women with no apparent
risk factors other than gender and age.
|
|
Source: NCI. A Snapshot of Breast Cancer (updated,
Aug. 2005.) Retrieved July 27, 2006 at: http://planning.cancer.gov/disease/
Breast-Snapshot.pdf |
In recent decades, the overall trend
of breast cancer incidence in the U.S. has been gradually
upward. Through most of the 1980s, incidence rates
rose sharply, as measured by an average annual increase
of 3.7%.8 During
the late 1980s and 1990s, the incidence rates slowed
to an annual average increase of 0.4%.9 In
the more recent time period, breast cancer incidence
rates increased only in women aged 50 and older.10
Most experts attribute the overall rise
in incidence to a combination of influences that include
changes in women's reproductive patterns (i.e., delayed
childbearing and having fewer children), improvements
in imaging technology, and an increased use of screening
mammography, which can detect breast cancer before
it causes symptoms. Since 1980, the incidence of ductal
carcinoma in situ (DCIS), one of the most common types
of early stage breast cancers, has increased more than
sevenfold.11
|
|
Source: NCI. A Snapshot of Breast Cancer (updated,
Aug. 2005.) Retrieved July 27, 2006 at: http://planning.cancer.gov/disease/
Breast-Snapshot.pdf |
As breast cancer incidence rates have
risen, mortality rates from breast cancer have declined.
Specifically, between 1990 and 2002, the mortality
rate for women of all races combined declined by 2.3%
annually, with larger decreases in women younger than
50.12 These
decreases are attributed to both earlier detection
and improved treatments.13
Still, breast cancer remains the second
leading cause of cancer death in
U.S women, after lung cancer.14 According
to the American Cancer Society, an estimated 40,970
U.S. women will have died from breast cancer in 2006.15 Based
on the most recent data, 12% of women diagnosed with
breast cancer die from the disease within five years.
At ten years, the rate is 20%, at fifteen years, 29%,
and at 20 years, the mortality rate for women diagnosed
with breast cancer is nearly 40%.16 The
key to surviving the disease is early
detection. If detected early, the 5 year relative survival
rate
for localized breast cancer is 98%.17
Screening Guidelines
The American Cancer Society currently
recommends that women begin getting an annual mammogram
at age 40. Women at increased risk (e.g., family history,
personal history of breast cancer, etc.) are encouraged
to consult with healthcare providers about the benefits
and limitations of earlier initiation of screening,
shorter screening intervals, or the addition of screening
modalities other than mammography and physical examination.
Efforts aimed at increasing access to screening for
more U.S. women are ongoing and hold promise for decreasing
the number of future deaths due to breast cancer. The
combined use of clinical breast examination,
mammogram and breast self-examination is believed
to offer the best opportunity for early detection. (For
more information, please see Detection
and Screening )
Top
Racial and Ethnic Patterns
*Age-Adjusted
Incidence
(per 100,000 women) by Race/Ethnicity
White 141.1
African American 119.4
Asian American/Pacific Island 96.6
Hispanic** 89.9
American Indian/Alaskan Native 54.8
*Based on SEER cancer
statistics (1998-2002).
**Hispanic is not mutually exclusive from White, African American,
Asian American/ Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native.
|
In the United States, breast cancer incidence
rates differ substantially among women from different
racial and ethnic groups.
Incidence is highest for White women,
followed by African-American, Asian American/Pacific
Island, Hispanic, and lastly, American Indian/Alaskan
Native women.18 The
incidence rate for the highest group (White) is two
and a half times as great as that for the lowest group
(American Indian/Alaskan Native). While reasons for
these differences are not fully understood, potential
explanations include differences in risk factor exposure,
differences in genetics and/or biology, and differences
in socioeconomic
conditions.
*Age-Adjusted
Mortality
(per 100,000 women) by Race/Ethnicity
African American 34.7
White 25.9
Hispanic** 16.7
American Indian/Alaskan Native 13.8
Asian American/Pacific Island 12.7
*Based on SEER cancer
statistics (1998-2002).
**Hispanic is not mutually exclusive from White, African American,
Asian American/ Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native.
|
Mortality rates among racial/ethnic groups
have a different pattern of disparity than that observed
for incidence.
Although incidence is highest for White
women, African American women have the highest mortality
rate, followed by White, Hispanic, Asian American/Pacific
Island, and American Indian/Alaskan Native women.19 Additionally,
for women with invasive breast cancer, the five-year
survival rate for African Americans is just 76%, compared
to a 90% five-year survival rate for Whites.20 Moreover,
between 1990 and 2002, as the mortality rate for women
of all races combined declined by 2.3% annually, it
declined by 2.4% annually in White women and just 1.0%
annually for African American women.21
In a report on recent trends in U.S.
mortality rates for four major cancers, including breast
cancer, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) states that differences among racial/ethnic groups "result
from a combination of factors such as behaviors (e.g.
smoking and nutrition); access to preventive, diagnostic,
therapeutic, and screening services; and aggressiveness
of treatment."22 The
CDC, which funds screening to underserved women through
the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection
Program, believes that modifying these factors could
prevent more than half of the cancer deaths and eliminate
most racial/ethnic disparities in cancer death rates.
 |
Additionally, some researchers have highlighted
differences in biology, especially in African American
women, whose breast tumors often exhibit more aggressive
characteristics. The prevalence of triple negative
breast tumors among African American women, for instance,
may be more than twice that as for White women.23 Characterized
by three biological components (i.e., negative for
estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2),
these triple negative tumors are unresponsive to the
most common and effective breast cancer treatments
and are more likely to have poor prognosis.24 In
addition, relative to other racial/ethnic groups, African
American women may have a higher prevalence of basal-like
breast tumors - one of the more aggressive breast cancer
subtypes for which there are currently no targeted
treatments.25
While these and other biological differences
have been observed, it is important to note that they
do not preclude the influence of social factors. As
one health disparities researcher explains, biology
is adaptive; it changes with changing environmental
conditions.26 As
such, the finding of biological differences among groups
living in different social conditions would not be
unexpected.
Top
Socioeconomic
Factors
Among
the U.S. population, 24% of African Americans
and 22% of Hispanics currently live in poverty,
compared with 8% of Whites. |
Among the U.S. population, 24% of African
Americans and 22% of Hispanics currently live in poverty,
compared with 8% of Whites.27 Moreover,
20% of African Americans and 32% of Hispanics lack
health insurance, while only 11% of Whites are uninsured.28 According
to the American Cancer Society, people living in poverty
and those who lack health insurance are more likely
to be diagnosed with advanced stage disease, more likely
to receive substandard medical care, and more likely
to die from cancer.29
Indeed, factors associated with lower
socioeconomic status (SES) may explain many of the
differences observed in breast cancer incidence and
mortality among racial and ethnic groups. In the case
of screening, for example, data from 2003 show that
White, African-American, and Hispanic women aged 40
and older were mammographically screened at similar
rates (55.5%, 54.2% and 52.6%). Women with and without
health insurance, however, were screened at remarkably
different rates (58% vs. 28.9%).30 Other
research studies have linked lower levels of education
to later stage diagnosis31 and
have shown that low income, independent of race, is
associated with inferior treatment (e.g., no surgery,
or no radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery).32 As
the National Cancer Institute explains, "[S]tudies
have found that SES, more than race, predicts the likelihood
of a group’s access to education, certain occupations,
and health insurance, as well as income level and living
conditions -- all of which are associated with someone’s
chance of developing and surviving cancer."33
Socioeconomic
factors can have an unwanted effect on provider/patient
interactions. |
Additionally, socioeconomic factors can
have an unwanted effect on provider/patient interactions.
According to health researchers, some providers may
withhold information if they think the patient won't
understand. Likewise, physicians may not recommend
a treatment to a patient that they think cannot afford
it.34 The
message to healthcare providers is to be aware of these
potential biases when interacting with patients and
to treat all patients equally. The National Cancer
Institute is clear on this issue: "equal care
for cancer results in equal outcomes and equal survival
rates...Conversely, unequal outcomes strongly suggest
unequal care."35
As the principal agency for cancer research
in the U.S., the National Cancer Institute (NCI) supports
scientific studies on socioeconomic factors and their
relationship to cancer incidence, survival, and mortality.
NCI also supports numerous intervention efforts, recognizing
that the burden of cancer is too often greater for
the poor, the uninsured, and for ethnic minorities.
Indeed, the Center
to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities (CRCHD) established
in 2001, was created by NCI "to reduce, and ultimately,
to end blatant injustices within the health care system."36
In addressing disparity issues, the CRCHD
considers the influence of financial and physical barriers,
as well as barriers related to information and education,
and those related to cultural differences and biases
in cancer care.37 An
example comes from the CRCHD's Patient Navigator Program
(PNP) which trains and assigns healthcare workers from
local communities to help underserved patients overcome
health system barriers to obtaining quality cancer
care. For more information on Patient
Navigator Programs, or for additional information
about CRCHD's mission, strategies and objectives, please
visit the CRCHD
web site.
Top
Consumer
Bill of Rights and Responsibilities
In 1998, The President's Advisory Commission
on Consumer Protection and Quality in the Health Care
Industry issued The Consumer Bill of Rights and Responsibilities
as part of its final report entitled Quality
First: Better Health Care for All Americans.
The Consumer Bill of Rights, also called the Patient
Bill of Rights, proposed eight principles which have
been adopted by many U.S. health plans, including those
sponsored by the federal government. The fifth principle
deals with issues of respect and nondiscrimination,
stating that consumers "have the right to considerate,
respectful care from all members of the health care
system at all times and under all circumstances." It
also states that consumers "must not be
discriminated against in the delivery of health care
services consistent with the benefits covered in their
policy or as required by law based on race, ethnicity,
national origin, religion, sex, age, mental or physical
disability, sexual orientation, genetic information,
or source of payment."38 Following
is a summary of all eight principles contained within
the Consumer Bill of Rights:39
- Information Disclosure. Consumers
have the right to receive accurate, easily understood
information, and some consumers require assistance
in making informed health care decisions about their
health plans, professionals and facilities.
- Choice of Providers and Plans. Consumers
have the right to a choice of health care providers
that is sufficient to ensure access to appropriate
high-quality health care.
- Access to Emergency Services. Consumers
have the right to access emergency health care services
when and where the need arises.
- Participation in Treatment Decisions. Consumers
have the right and responsibility to fully participate
in all decisions related to their health care. Consumers
who are unable to fully participate in treatment
decisions have the right to be represented by parents,
guardians, family members, or other conservators.
- Respect and Nondiscrimination. Consumers
have the right to considerate, respectful care from
all members of the health care industry at all times
and under all circumstances.
- Confidentiality of Health Information. Consumers
have the right to communicate with health care providers
in confidence and to have the confidentiality of
their individually identifiable health care information
protected. Consumers also have the right to review
and copy their own medical records and request amendments
to their records.
- Complaints and Appeals. Consumers
have the right to a fair and efficient process for
resolving differences with their health plans, health
care providers, and the institutions that serve them,
including a rigorous system of internal review and
an independent system of external review.
- Consumer Responsibilities. In
a health care system that protects consumers' rights,
it is reasonable to expect and encourage consumers
to assume reasonable responsibilities. Greater individual
involvement by consumers in their care increases
the likelihood of achieving the best outcomes and
helps support a quality improvement, cost-conscious
environment.
The full report to the President on the
Consumer Bill of Rights and Responsibilities is available
on the web site of The
President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality in the Health Care Industry.
Top
Current Research
In
1997, NCI assembled a multidisciplinary working
group of scientists, clinicians, and advocates
to help define a national research agenda for
breast cancer. |
Since the passage of the National Cancer
Act in 1971,40 the
National Cancer Institute has led the nation's effort
in supporting a wide range of scientific studies whose
collective and ultimate mission is saving lives. In
1997, NCI assembled a multidisciplinary working group
of scientists, clinicians, and advocates to help define
a national research agenda for breast cancer. Seven
years later, a separate NCI Breast Cancer Working Group
was convened to assess the nation's progress. At the
time of the 2004 assessment, the following initiatives
were either in clinical trials or had been developed
and approved.41
- Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer in
high-risk women
- Aromatase inhibitors for treatment of estrogen
receptor-positive breast cancer
- Monoclonal antibodies for treatment of tumors
that express Her2/ErbB2
- Sentinel node biopsy for less-invasive surgical
diagnosis and prognosis
- Lumpectomy with radiation as an equivalent alternative
to mastectomy for certain stages of disease
- Preoperative therapy to reduce the size of large
tumors, thereby allowing more women to undergo breast-conserving
surgery
 |
Since 1998, NCI's breast cancer research
investment has increased from $348.6 million42 to
an estimated $560.1 million in 2005.43 In
FY 2005, the total dollars were distributed among seven
scientific areas of interest as follows: biology (18%);
etiology (18%); prevention (8%); early detection, diagnosis
and prognosis (15%); treatment (23%); cancer control,
survivorship, and outcomes research (15%); and lastly,
scientific model systems (3%).44 These
seven areas, also called the Common Scientific Outline
(CSO), continue to guide all NCI research today. Moreover,
the CSO serves to facilitate coordination and comparison
among public, private, national and international cancer
research organizations. For descriptions of the CSO
categories, as well as listings of current breast cancer
research projects, funding opportunities, and resources,
please refer to NCI's Cancer
Research Portfolio web site.
In addition to government organizations,
private organizations provide significant levels of
support for breast cancer research in the U.S. The
largest among these is the American Cancer Society
(ACS), which, in August 2005, was funding 188 research
projects relating to breast cancer, totaling more than
$103.8 million. ACS also sponsors grants in support
of training for health professionals seeking to develop
their clinical expertise and/or their ability to conduct
independent research. Select areas of breast cancer
research currently being investigated by ACS grantees
are listed as follows:45
- the role of insurance and government policies in
breast cancer screening among low-income women
- the psychological factors in chemotherapy-related
fatigue
- the use of DNA microchips to identify genes involved
in breast cancer development and progression
- how diet interacts with genetics to influence breast
cancer risk
- the development of mouse models with human breast
cancer genes to test drugs
- the mechanism of action of a new breast cancer
therapeutic vaccine
- how an estrogen receptor-positive tumor becomes
estrogen receptor-negative
- the quality of life among younger breast cancer
survivors
- the possible effects of certain breast cancer treatments
on thinking and memory
In addition to these, ACS notes a number
of specific recent advances in breast cancer research
that have led to improved methods across broad areas,
including hormone therapy for prevention in high-risk
women; MRI for use in breast biopsy procedures (allowing
for many samples with one small incision); microvascular
surgery and skin-sparing mastectomy (facilitating a
more natural-looking breast in breast reconstruction);
and in breast cancer treatment, the use of monoclonal
antibodies (trastuzumab); more effective dosing methods
with chemotherapy, and progress with antiangiogenesis
therapy.46 Additionally,
the American Society of Clinical Oncology lists improvements
in the delivery of radiation therapy, such as partial
breast radiation, brachytherapy, and intensity-modulated
radiation.47
Lastly, NCI reminds that "the successful
application of evidence-based interventions for preempting
cancer through prevention, detection, diagnosis, and
treatment depends on our ability to move effective
interventions into practice."48 Collaborative,
multidisciplinary partnerships across public and private
sectors help ensure that the beneficial results of
breast cancer research are widely adopted by public
health programs and clinical practices throughout the
U.S., reaching as many people as possible.
Top
Notes
1American
Cancer Society.Cancer
Facts & Figures 2006. Retrieved
Aug. 17, 2006 at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/STT/content/STT_1x_Cancer_Facts__Figures_2006.asp
2National
Cancer Institute. Probability of Breast Cancer
in American Women (Apr. 15, 2005). Retrieved
Aug. 17, 2006 at: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Detection/
probability-breast-cancer
3American
Cancer Society. How
Many Women Get Breast Cancer? (Sep.
16, 2005). Retrieved Aug. 17, 2006 at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_2_1X_How_many_
people _get_breast_cancer _5.asp?sitearea=
4Surveillance Epidemiology
and End Results.Cancer
Stat Fact Sheets: Cancer of the Breast. Retrieved
Aug. 17, 2006 at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html?statfacts_
page= breast.html&x=14&y=17
5American
Cancer Society. What
Are the Key Statistics About Breast Cancer in Men? (Sep.
14, 2005). Retrieved Aug. 17, 2006 at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_4_1X_What_
are_the_key_statistics_for_male_breast_cancer_28.asp?rnav=cri
6Medline
Plus. Breast Cancer (Apr.
3, 2007). Retrieved Nov. 21, 2007 at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/
medlineplus/ency/article/000913.htm
7In
addition to gender and age, other risk factors for
breast cancer include early onset of menses and late
menopause; nulliparity or first full-term pregnancy
after age 30; use of postmenopausal hormone replacement
therapy; genetic factors; family history of breast
cancer; high breast density; certain benign breast
changes; a personal history of some cancers; high-dose
radiation therapy to the chest; daily alcohol consumption;
and obesity.
8-9See
note 4.
10American
Cancer Society. Breast
Cancer Facts & Figures 2005-2006. Retrieved
Apr. 16, 2007 at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/STT/content/STT_1x_Breast_Cancer_Facts__Figures_2005-2006.asp
11Behind
the Cancer Headlines. Early
Stage Breast Cancer Rates are Rising as Incidence of
Invasive Cases are Leveling (Apr. 14, 2005).
Retrieved Apr. 18, 2006 at: http://www.mabcie.com/
April_14,_2005_breast_cancer.html
12See
note 10.
13American
Cancer Society. What
Are the Key Statistics for Breast Cancer? (Sep.
2, 2005). Retrieved Aug. 17, 2006 at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_4_1X_
What_ are_the_key_statistics_for_breast_cancer_5.asp?sitearea=
14See
note 13.
15See
note 1.
16-17See
note 10.
18-19See
note 1.
20-21The
American Cancer Society attributes these less favorable
outcomes in African American women to later stage detection
and poorer stage-specific survival. See
note 11.
22Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention. Recent
Trends in Mortality Rates for Four Major Cancers, by
Sex and Race/Ethnicity --- United States, 1990--1998.
(Jan, 2002). Retrieved Aug. 16, 2006 at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5103a1.htm
23 Behind
the Cancer Headlines. Racial
Differences in Triple Negative Breast Tumors Among
Women in Atlanta (Apr.
10, 2006). Retrieved Aug. 18, 2006 at: http://www.mabcie.com/
April_10,_2006_breast_cancer.html
24Steelquist,
Colleen. Ethnic Differences
in Breast-Cancer (May 5, 2005). Retrieved
Aug. 18, 2006 at: http://www.fhcrc.org/about/pubs/center_news/2005/may5/sart4.html
25Behind
the Cancer Headlines. Pre-menopausal
African-American Women More Likely to Have Certain
Type of Breast Cancer (Jun.
12, 2006). Retrieved Aug. 18, 2006 at: http://www.mabcie.com/
June_12, _2006 _breast_cancer.html
26Behind
the Cancer Headlines.Overcoming
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare (Feb.
28, 2005). Retrieved Aug. 18, 2006 at: http://www.mabcie.com/
February_28,_2005_breast_cancer.html
27-29See
note 1.
30See
note 10.
31American
Cancer Society. Lower
Education, Income Linked to Late Cancer Diagnosis (Feb.
20, 2002). Retrieved Aug. 10, 2006 at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/NWS/content/NWS
_1_1x_ Lower_Education_Income_Linked_to_Late_Cancer_Diagnosis.asp
32American
Cancer Society. Treatment
for Breast Cancer Linked to Socioeconomic Status (Apr.
3, 2004). Retrieved Aug. 10, 2006 at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/NWS/content/NWS
_1_1x_ Treatment_for_Breast_Cancer_Linked_to_Socioeconomic_Status.asp
33National
Cancer Institute. Cancer
Health Disparities: A Fact Sheet. (Nov.
30, 2005). Retrieved Apr. 16, 2007 at: http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/benchmarks-vol5-issue6/page2
34See
note 31.
35National
Cancer Institute. Health
Information Tip Sheet for Writers: Cancer Health Disparities. (updated,
Nov. 30, 2005). Retrieved Aug. 15, 2005 at: http://www.cancer.gov/
newscenter/tip-sheet-cancer-health-disparities
36Center
to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities. Introduction
to the Center. Retrieved Aug. 15, 2005 at: http://crchd.nci.nih.gov/introduction
37See
note 35.
38Advisory
Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the
Health Care Industry.Consumer
Bill of Rights and Responsibilities - Chapter Five:
Respect and Nondiscrimination. Retrieved Aug.
25, 2005 at: http://www.hcqualitycommission.gov/cborr/chap5.html
39Advisory
Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the
Health Care Industry. Consumer
Bill of Rights and Responsibilities - Summary of the
Document. Retrieved Aug. 25, 2005 at: http://www.hcqualitycommission.gov/press/cbor.html#head1
40For
information on The National Cancer Act of 1971, please
see: Cancer Research.The
1971 National Cancer Act. Retrieved Aug. 15,
2005 at:http://rex.nci.nih.gov/massmedia/
CANCER_ RESRCH_WEBSITE/1971.html
41-42National
Cancer Institute. Breast
Cancer Progress Report. (October
2004). Retrieved Aug. 15, 2005 at: http://planning.cancer.gov/pdfprgreports/2004breastcancer-pdf/allchapters.pdf
43-44National
Cancer Institute. A
Snapshot of Breast Cancer. (Sep.,
2006). Retrieved Apr. 16, 2007 at: http://planning.cancer.gov/disease/Breast-Snapshot.pdf
45American
Cancer Society. What
Research Is Currently Being Done on Breast Cancer? Retrieved
Aug. 16, 2006 at:http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_6x_What_Research
_Is_Currently_Being_Done_On_Breast_Cancer.asp?sitearea=
46American
Cancer Society. What's
New in Breast Cancer Research? Retrieved Aug.
16, 2006 at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_2_7X_
Whats_new_in_breast_cancer_ research_5.asp?sitearea=
47People
Living With Cancer (PLWC). Breast
Cancer: Current Research. Retrieved Aug. 13,
2006 at: http://www.plwc.org/portal/site/PLWC/menuitem.6067beb2271039bcfd748f68ee37a01d/?vgnextoid=
6ec6ea7105daa010 VgnVCM100000ed730ad1RCRD&vgnextfmt=cancer
48National
Cancer Institute. Current
NCI Portfolio. Retrieved
January 31, 2007 at: http://plan2007.cancer.gov/currentNCIport.shtml
All external links are provided
as a service to our visitors for information purposes
only. No endorsement is made or implied.
Revised: November 30,
2007.
|